Reproducibility and open science
I participate in large-scale collaborative projects that assess the reproducibility and robustness of empirical findings in the social sciences. As part of a team of over 300 researchers, I contributed to a study published in Nature that systematically re-analysed economics and political science research, finding that the majority of original findings are reproducible but that effect sizes are often smaller than originally reported. I have also been involved in work comparing human-only, AI-assisted, and AI-led teams in assessing research reproducibility.
Beyond collaborative replication projects, my commitment to open science has shaped my work as Editor-in-Chief of European Societies (2021–2026). Together with my co-editors, I introduced mandatory replication packages for quantitative articles — a pioneering step in sociology that has since been adopted by other leading journals. We also led the journal’s transition to a non-commercial, diamond open access model under MIT Press, making all articles free to read and free to publish, and opened the journal’s entire back catalogue to readers worldwide. These changes reflect a broader vision of sociological knowledge as a public good, where access and voice move together: lowering barriers to participation while ensuring that a broader range of scholars, institutions, and regions shapes the discipline’s debates.
Key publications
Reproducibility and robustness of economics and political science research
Nature, 652, 151–156 (2026)
Comparing human-only, AI-assisted, and AI-led teams on assessing research reproducibility in quantitative social science
I4R Discussion Paper Series (2025)
What we promised, and what we delivered
European Societies, 28(1), 1–4 (2026)
Transforming European Societies through open access and transparency
European Societies, 27(1), 1–3 (2025)
An invitation to submit
European Societies, 24(1), 1–6 (2022)